Archive for the ‘Society’ Category

Name and Shame – Modern day pillory?

Monday, July 10th, 2006

Dictionary definition of pillory:
1) A wooden frame to hold the head, hands and/or feet. People were locked in the ‘stocks’ for a period of time as a punishment.
2) If someone is pilloried they are criticised severely, especially in newspapers or on radio and television. “He was pilloried in the newspapers and his resignation demanded�.

Emotions are such an effective way to get people to do what you want. Dare I say it, emotions are a powerful way to control people. Look at these examples that parents can use with children:

Anger – “If you don’t clean your room mummy will get angryâ€?
Guilt – “ If you don’t say you love mummy she will feel sadâ€?
Fear – “ If you don’t behave mummy will go awayâ€? (Fear of abandonment)
Shame – “You should be ashamed of your self for thinking sexual thoughtsâ€?

However shame is in a group of its own in this way. The psychiatrist and prolific writer Charles Rycroft has stated: “Shame is the Cinderella of the unpleasant emotions�.

Of all the emotions shame really hurts, it is painful as all readers undoubtedly would know. Thus people quickly learn that it is an effective tool to get people to do what you think is right. Parents are a good example. Many a parent has said “You should be ashamed of yourself for ……..â€? (Hitting your sister, not eating all your dinner, for masturbating and so on endlessly.)

medium_shame

However that is not the end of the story. If you thought shame was the Cinderella of the unpleasant emotions then you are wrong. It is nothing compared to public shaming. Humiliating someone is bad enough, but publicly humiliating or shaming them is 10 times more powerful. To threaten to publicly shame someone is one of the most potent threats that can be made.

So what’s the problem?. All children have to learn how to behave and what is right and wrong. One could not disagree with that. Shame lets a child no what is right and wrong. That would then seem to be a good learning experience for them. There is just one problem. Shaming a person, especially publicly shaming a person has one unfortunate side effect. It shreds their self esteem. If you publicly humiliate someone then its like putting their self esteem through one of those shredder machines. It cuts to the person’s core sense of self, chews it up and spits it out.

medium_delaware

As any counsellor will tell you, if you are dealing with a person who’s parents used shame as the primary means of socialising a child then you are going to be dealing with a person who’s self image has been butchered. Such a person will not feel very highly of them self at all.

However it is not only parents who can begin to understand the power of publicly humiliating someone. Teachers have for a long time used such a technique. Controlling a class of 25 students is no easy task so public humiliation can be an effective tool. This reminds me of event that occurred many years ago when I was in second year high school. I recall being in the chemistry lab class and there was a fellow student who was joking down the back of the class. In fact I even remember his surname – Bebbington-Smyth – who could forget a name like that!

The chemistry teacher decided to put an end to all this joking and pulled Mr Bebbington-Smyth out to the front of the class. He was going to make him stand in front of the class and squirm – public humiliation in action. A smart move on the teachers behalf as it also showed to all other students that if you misbehave then you get publicly humiliated.

So standing out in front of the class the teacher stated to Mr Bebbington -Smyth that since he was such a comedian why doesn’t he let us all in on the joke. The expectation was that he would stand there in silence feeling humiliated, being pilloried. However Mr Bebbington -Smyth then proceeded to tell his brief funny story to which everyone laughed at the humour of it all!!! The teachers attempt a public shaming had completely backfired!

Here are some images of pillory from the past.

medium_cornwall_1860
medium_williamjarvis

Here is a quote from the editor of the Guardian Express newspaper, (March 28 – April 3, 2006.), which is a local newspaper where I live.

“However, the fact remains that three AFL footballers involved had taken illicit drugs. Had they been caught with these illicit substances by the police, they would have been charged and, in all likelihood, named and shamed� Editorial (Page 6)
AFL football is the major sport where I live and three footballers have tested positive for recreational drugs. The press are in a frenzy because a court has ruled that their names cannot be published. They can’t be named and shamed in public.

The press in the state where I live have a policy of naming and shaming members of the public. What does naming and shaming mean?. It means that they will put your name in the newspaper, often with a photograph, often with the name of the suburb and street in which you live, and then a statement of what you have done that is, in their view shameful or immoral. They have no hesitation in using their naming and shaming policy. They will publicly shame members of the general public with great regularity.

I must say this is a little disconcerting because it makes one wonder who is next? What is the next group of the general public who the press will decide deserve to be named and shamed. Maybe its anyone who has had an affair, or anyone who has had a messy divorce, or anyone who has driven whilst being over the blood alcohol limit and hasn’t been caught, or anyone who has been involved in a domestic dispute. As far as I can tell they can pick anyone or any group they like to publicly humiliate. There seems to be no restriction at all on this policy of naming and shaming by the press.

So here he is the head honcho, Rupert Murdoch. Namer and shamer. Public humiliator. Rupert you should be ashamed of yourself. Just think of all the angst, pain and distress that you have caused for those thousands and thousands of people who you have publicly humiliated.

medium_murdoch-778522

OMG I suddenly realised!!!!. Have I crossed the line, have I gone over to the other side. Have I become!!!, surely not!!!, heavens no!!!, a namer and shamer. I should be ashamed of my self for doing so.

Psychology and the church

Monday, July 10th, 2006

This is an email that i worte to someone recently

Some of my thoughts on the topic of psychology and the church. Many view them as irreconcilable, but in my view that is because they have thrown the baby out with the bathwater.

I will use TA vernacular here but all this applies to psychology in general , in particular humanistic (vs behaviouristic) psychology

It is a fact that for most in our society they do not have enough Free Child ego state, (except for special sub-groups like prisoners who have too much Free Child.) But in general society most neuroses result from too little or damaged Free Child. The Parent ego state via the biological parents damages the Child ego state .

The Parent ego state is a rule book that tells the FC what it can and can’t do, so the natural urges and feelings and so forth get stuffed up because it has to conform to this rule book.

What else is a rule book on how to live life? No, no prize for the right answer. The bible, the Koran or whatever. These ‘books’ very clearly and specifically define how the FC must be (ie the 10 commandments)

So psychologies, or more correctly some people using the psychologies have linked the the bible and the prohibitive parental messages

The Parent ego state and the bible are both a set of prohibitions so some psychologies have made the Parent ego state and the church teachings in the bible the same thing. Indeed many parents, particularly in the past would use the biblical teachings to get the children’s FC to do what they though was best. Often this did screw the youngster up.

The Parent ego state and the bible are both a set of prohibitions so some psychologies or those people using the psychologies have said that religion is bad because it messes up humans psychologically. Indeed this has happened when parents use the teaching of the bible to suppress the Free Child ego state.

However in my view this is a misunderstanding of the church/bible/religion. It misses out one factor and that is that thing called faith/belief/spirituality. Many psychologies would say that when a person has achieved a faith/belief/spirituality then they are more self actualized and more a complete person psychologically.

However many never get to that level of heightened self actualization . Instead they are at the level of just getting their basic shit together. So psychology has tended to see religion as a set of bad script prohibitions that just screw up the Child ego state. But that is a misunderstanding of religion. To have a faith or belief in whatever would be seen as a very psychologically healthy thing. So if one wants to use the bible as the thing in which they have a faith and belief then psychologically that would be seen as a good thing. If one uses the teaching of the bible to prohibit the natural human Free Child then you are going to get neuroses.

Creativity or conforminty

Monday, July 10th, 2006

Graffitist or drone?

Why do we/they seek to drive the creative youth out of our society. To turn them into drones who do what they are told, such as those who express themselves with such art forms like graffiti.

There have been many creative artists over the years and most often the social engineers of a society have tried to squash them back to the norm. Fortunately some resist being pushed into the square and we as a society can benefit greatly. Here is one – Sir Mick Jagger. He has been given and accepted a knighthood in the UK. He is now a pillar of society.

But he was a “graffiti artist� in his time. He broke the rules and the social engineers stamped on him hard.

In 1967 he was arrested and charged with possession of amphetamines and heroin. He was found guilty and imprisoned. He certainly broke the rules just like the graffiti artist.

medium_mick_mug_shot.png Sir Mick Jagger, Knight of the British Empire.

(Wait a minute! The social engineers tell us that if you take amphetamines you go crazy. Well Mick Jagger and his co-accused Keith Richards didn’t go crazy. Maybe the social engineers are treating us like we are dumb arses. Not telling us the whole truth about such things as drugs and expecting us to just accept it like sheep.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

But he also broke other rules. He “drew pictures on the wallsâ€? by writing such songs as – (I can’t get no) Satisfaction:

I can’t get no satisfaction,
I can’t get no girl with action.
’cause I try and I try and I try and I try.
I can’t get no, I can’t get no.
When I’m ridin’ round the world
And I’m doin’ this and I’m signing that
And I’m tryin’ to make some girl
Who tells me baby better come back later next week
’cause you see I’m on losing streak.
I can’t get no, oh no no no.
Hey hey hey, that’s what I say.
I can’t get no, I can’t get no,
I can’t get no satisfaction,
No satisfaction, no satisfaction, no satisfaction

medium_destroylit.jpg Sir Mick in action. I think that says “Destroy” on his T-shirt. That’s a nice sociable thing to project to the impressionable fans.

How did the social engineers react -

The song’s lyrics were extremely controversial in their day; Jagger stated that “the lyrics to this were truly threatening to an older audience. This song was perceived as an attack on the status quo”. The part where Jagger addressed his romantic troubles was also perceived to be overtly sexual suggestive; when the Rolling Stones performed the song on The Ed Sullivan Show in 1966, the line “trying to make some girl” was censored.

And now

Well he has been knighted and the social engineers are now crowing about how their society developed this person and he is the front man of one of the most famous rock & roll bands of all time. Even though they were the ones that tried to extinguish him in the first place!!

(However it should be noted that in true graffitist style, his fellow band member Keith Richards stated of Sir Mick’s knighthood – “I thought it was ludicrous to take one of those gongs from the establishment…it’s not what the Stones is about, is it? I don’t want to step out on stage with someone wearing a fucking coronet and sporting the old ermine. I told Mick, ‘It’s a fucking paltry honour.’)

Graffitists
It seems possible, perhaps even probable that some graffitist now will develop into a very fine artist at a later time. But the social engineers will try their hardest to stop him being creative now and make him into a drone. Then in 10 years when he is receiving accolades for his fine artistry the social engineers will again be there standing next to him taking the kudos for having a society that can produce such fine artisans.

Two examples
In the final analysis one needs to make a choice at least to some degree between creativity and conformity or between graffitist or drone. A good friend of mine (Yoshita Moronaga) an organisational psychologist in Japan writes:

“The structure of Japanese society in itself places a lot of pressure on the individual. It is a sad fact that Japanese society tends to stifle creativity. We even have an expression for this – ‘The nail that stands up will be hammered down’. As one example, Japan has won only four Nobel prizes in science while American researchers have won 158.â€? (As of 1990)

Singapore is in the same situation to some degree. In that society there is very little graffiti and they openly acknowledge that their society lacks creativity.

Times they are a changin’

Monday, July 10th, 2006

I have been a psychotherapist now for 20 years and have seen some changes in that time. One of the most interesting is the change in the stigma associated with psychology and psychotherapy.
Years ago when someone would come and see me they would park around the corner from my office, wear a hat and enter in the backdoor. To go and see a psychologist carried a stigma. “Only mad people went and saw psychologists�, was the general belief. Only the insane went to such places. So it was something that many kept very quiet and battled with.
Times have changed and now many clients will park right out the front of the office and wave to others as they are coming into the building. It is no longer a stigma at least in a country like Australia. In fact it is fashionable to have a counselor for many now. Its a fashion statement one can make at cocktail parties.

WHY?
A significant section of the community in this country has at one time seen a counselor of some kind. Indeed in the family law court system where there is debate over access to children and/or property, before one can actually go to court the couple have to go through a sort of counseling/mediation session(s) to see if the matter can be resolved there. That amounts to a lot of people in just that way getting counseling.
I also think it is a sign of an affluent society. As the basic needs of food and shelter become more widely met and more secure, people can then start to think about other things. Such as navel gazing and then one can seek assistance when they look into their navel and are disturbed by what they find. People have the time to do that more these days.

Also and even though I hate to say it television shows like Oprah have had an impact. I have had countless people come to me at least partly because they saw this person on such shows like Oprah that in some way reminded them of themselves, and then wanted to investigate it.

Finally occupational ‘counseling or debriefing’ is very wide spread in the country that I live in. Any person who has had some negative experience at work is offered counseling paid for by the company. So this normalizes counseling even if people don’t take up the offer of free sessions.

Whatever the reasons there has definitely been a change over two decades. Of course that is good for me being in the profession. However regardless of the financial concerns I also think it is good that those who struggle with anxiety, depression and the likes do not have to also struggle with a stigma of seeking some psychological assistence.

The Rebellious Child

Monday, July 10th, 2006

The Sex Pistols. That great rock and roll band in the 1970’s

Here are some lyrics from one of their best songs

“Anarchy In The U.K.”

Right! Now ha ha ha…

I am an antichrist
I am an anarchist
Don’t know what I want
But I know how to get it
I wanna destroy the passerby

‘Cause I wanna be Anarchy’

Imagine what would happen now days if the Sex Pistols were making their music, and they wrote a song about Allah. It would make some cartoons look like daffodils.

It can’t be much clearer than the Sex Pistols said it. In a christian dominated society like the UK, to have a high profile band say it as straight as that.

They didn’t say:

She was an antichrist
He was an antichrist
I was an antichrist
I will be an antichrist

They said

I AM AN ANTICHRIST!!!

That is a slap in the face and punch in the stomach at the same time.

Perhaps one can judge the strength of a society on its ability to handle rebellion. It seems safe to say that whenever you try and crush rebellion you are always living on borrowed time. Even if you can make a group of people a group of slaves for you, then you constantly live in a state of fear of a slave rebellion. And who wants to live like that – always looking over your shoulder for the knife in the back.

Hence we get to graffiti. A rebellious act in a society. Don’t try and crush it, instead manage it. Give them some freedom and your problems will be much, much less.

The same is for individual psychology. One must never try and crush/disable/defeat the Rebellious Child ego state. Even when that same ego state is destroying the individual. You manage it and learn to live with it. Even if it brings one to an early death.

The christian dominated UK society managed the Sex Pistols spitting in their face – “I AM AN ANTICHRIST”. Our own Prime Minister in Australia has openly supported no legislation against the burning of the Australian flag, even in these very nationalistic times. In my view a very wise move. Don’t try and crush the Rebellious Child ego state learn how to live with it and manage it. Even if it sometimes spits in your face.