Archive for the ‘transactional analysis’ Category

The empty chair

Monday, July 10th, 2006

The Empty Chair -
no longer is it the couch.

Rob van Tol

http://bobodoll.blogspot.com

Recently wrote a posting titled, “Stuntz Multiple Chair Work and Me�. Multiple chair work is a psychotherapeutic technique. He discusses this technique with a personal statement about his experiences with it. It is used for many therapeutic reasons, one being an awareness or understanding of self. For instance he states,

“So it was import to access my Parent and deconfuse my Adult … Or, in non-TA terms, I didn’t have either a strong conscience, nor look after myself well. And when I think about the here and now I was (and can still be) influenced by the fears and decisions I made as a child.
It terms of awareness, I was just conscious of being, and unaware of the different intrapsychic conversations I had and how they could be categorised, or what their voices sounded like.�

Thanks Rob for being candid.

I will call it the empty chair technique, and you know what? When I began on this career path I was amazed that people could do it and I was even more amazed when I did it!!. So what is “it�. A person sits in a chair and then an empty chair is placed in front of the person about 4 or 5 feet away. They are then asked to imagine some person or some part of themself in that chair and start talking to them/it. Weird, I know. But people can actually do it. I know, I couldn’t believe it either until I saw it with my own eyes.

There is a thing people can do and that is called ‘Projection’. They can kind of put a part of themself out on to some one or some thing in the world. So a person who is angry can project that anger onto others and they will then see others out there as angry when in fact most of them aren’t. This is how the empty chair thingee works. People project some part of themself into an empty chair.

I have never seen such intense emotions of anger and hatred, fear and terror, sadness and grief, despair, love and affection and so on all expressed to a empty chair!! When first asked to do it most feel a bit odd talking to an empty chair, most get over that in about a minute and then project out onto the chair with sometimes such powerful emotions attached.

Lost child ego state

Lost child

People discover all sorts of things such as the lost child part of themself. Because one was abused, scared or maybe just consistently ignored sometimes the emotional part of ourself goes and hides away. A fairly normal thing for kids to do. If mummy is angry then a good, effective solution is to go and hide. Problem solved (in the short term). The problem is if it happens over and over eventually the child gets forgotten about. Our inner emotional self is lost, we forget about it. When that happens people start doing odd things because their basic needs are not met for a significant period of time. For example our need for affection is not met. A woman starts to find that she is being promiscious. Her needs for affection are not being met and she discovers that sex seems to somehow feed that need a bit and so she starts to confuse affection and sex. Empty chair sometimes allows this lost child to be found again.

Promiscuity

Surviving via promiscuity

Sometimes there just seems to be no hope. Whatever you do is wrong. If you say yes it is wrong and if you say no it is wrong. Or mummy is just so preoccupied with her own ‘shit’ she just has no emotions left over for you. (This is not her fault as she proably had a mummy who was the same). You live in an emotional desert and you stave for feeling. Common in habitual drug users.

Man in empty chair

Other times it is the oppostie. Some one discovers in the empty chair that there is a happy, cheerful girl. The good girl. We get lots of mummy and daddy’s attention. They dote on me but there seems to be some conditions on such attention. It is conditional attention. I get lots of attention when I am happy and good and people notice me and say how sweet I am. Mummy and daddy like that. If I am not happy and not ‘performing’ then I either get told off in some way or just ignored. So in adulthood even when I am at my partner’s funeral I find I am smiling.

Good girl

The good girl

Finally the other one is that distance between the idealized self and the real self. We all have an ideal for self in looks, in education, in sport, in popularity, in success, in being a parent and so on endlessly. Then there is the reality that is different from the ideal. For most the difference is not all that large. But sometimes people put the ideal in the empty chair and it becomes obvious that the difference is a fucking chasam, as big as Ayers Rock. These people suffer as they strive to achieve the unachievable. Often they are olympic atheletes. “If I win olympic gold then I will be a worth while person� is the magical belief. Even if they do happen to win it, it still doesn’t fill the void.

Barbie face compare

In search of the ideal self

The best thing that a psychologist can hear is a person say, “I am happy with who I am�. That is music to my ears. We are all fucked up a bit. That is human nature. If one can see the bigger picture and create a life for self where one can live with the good bits and the not so good bits then one has got it together. One is “cured�. If you can love who is in the empty chair, then my job is done.

Psychology and the church

Monday, July 10th, 2006

This is an email that i worte to someone recently

Some of my thoughts on the topic of psychology and the church. Many view them as irreconcilable, but in my view that is because they have thrown the baby out with the bathwater.

I will use TA vernacular here but all this applies to psychology in general , in particular humanistic (vs behaviouristic) psychology

It is a fact that for most in our society they do not have enough Free Child ego state, (except for special sub-groups like prisoners who have too much Free Child.) But in general society most neuroses result from too little or damaged Free Child. The Parent ego state via the biological parents damages the Child ego state .

The Parent ego state is a rule book that tells the FC what it can and can’t do, so the natural urges and feelings and so forth get stuffed up because it has to conform to this rule book.

What else is a rule book on how to live life? No, no prize for the right answer. The bible, the Koran or whatever. These ‘books’ very clearly and specifically define how the FC must be (ie the 10 commandments)

So psychologies, or more correctly some people using the psychologies have linked the the bible and the prohibitive parental messages

The Parent ego state and the bible are both a set of prohibitions so some psychologies have made the Parent ego state and the church teachings in the bible the same thing. Indeed many parents, particularly in the past would use the biblical teachings to get the children’s FC to do what they though was best. Often this did screw the youngster up.

The Parent ego state and the bible are both a set of prohibitions so some psychologies or those people using the psychologies have said that religion is bad because it messes up humans psychologically. Indeed this has happened when parents use the teaching of the bible to suppress the Free Child ego state.

However in my view this is a misunderstanding of the church/bible/religion. It misses out one factor and that is that thing called faith/belief/spirituality. Many psychologies would say that when a person has achieved a faith/belief/spirituality then they are more self actualized and more a complete person psychologically.

However many never get to that level of heightened self actualization . Instead they are at the level of just getting their basic shit together. So psychology has tended to see religion as a set of bad script prohibitions that just screw up the Child ego state. But that is a misunderstanding of religion. To have a faith or belief in whatever would be seen as a very psychologically healthy thing. So if one wants to use the bible as the thing in which they have a faith and belief then psychologically that would be seen as a good thing. If one uses the teaching of the bible to prohibit the natural human Free Child then you are going to get neuroses.

The Rebellious Child

Monday, July 10th, 2006

The Sex Pistols. That great rock and roll band in the 1970’s

Here are some lyrics from one of their best songs

“Anarchy In The U.K.”

Right! Now ha ha ha…

I am an antichrist
I am an anarchist
Don’t know what I want
But I know how to get it
I wanna destroy the passerby

‘Cause I wanna be Anarchy’

Imagine what would happen now days if the Sex Pistols were making their music, and they wrote a song about Allah. It would make some cartoons look like daffodils.

It can’t be much clearer than the Sex Pistols said it. In a christian dominated society like the UK, to have a high profile band say it as straight as that.

They didn’t say:

She was an antichrist
He was an antichrist
I was an antichrist
I will be an antichrist

They said

I AM AN ANTICHRIST!!!

That is a slap in the face and punch in the stomach at the same time.

Perhaps one can judge the strength of a society on its ability to handle rebellion. It seems safe to say that whenever you try and crush rebellion you are always living on borrowed time. Even if you can make a group of people a group of slaves for you, then you constantly live in a state of fear of a slave rebellion. And who wants to live like that – always looking over your shoulder for the knife in the back.

Hence we get to graffiti. A rebellious act in a society. Don’t try and crush it, instead manage it. Give them some freedom and your problems will be much, much less.

The same is for individual psychology. One must never try and crush/disable/defeat the Rebellious Child ego state. Even when that same ego state is destroying the individual. You manage it and learn to live with it. Even if it brings one to an early death.

The christian dominated UK society managed the Sex Pistols spitting in their face – “I AM AN ANTICHRIST”. Our own Prime Minister in Australia has openly supported no legislation against the burning of the Australian flag, even in these very nationalistic times. In my view a very wise move. Don’t try and crush the Rebellious Child ego state learn how to live with it and manage it. Even if it sometimes spits in your face.