State of emotional arousal

August 17th, 2006

Sex and Aggression

I have always said to counsellors and psychologists that is you ever want to fill up a workshop run it on sex or aggression. Better still run it on sex and aggression. Why would this be? First let us look at these two human conditions – sex an aggression

When we feel angry or aggressive our bodies change physically. 10 of the main changes are:
1. In response to an electrical stimulation in the hypothalamus area of the brain, an extra supply of the hormone adrenaline is secreted and distributed.
2. Respiration deepens. [Provides extra supplies of oxygen to feed the increased blood supply coming into the lungs]
3. Heart beats more rapidly. [Pumps more blood to the muscles and lungs, to carry more fuel and oxygen to and from the battle front.]
4. Blood pressure rises.
5. Sympathetic nervous system diverts blood from the skin. liver, stomach and intestines to the heart, CNS and muscles.
6. Digestive processes are suspended. Stomach and intestines virtually stop their secretions and movements. [Blood diverted to the muscles and heart and lungs. This 'self transfusion' allows more performance of muscular power.]
7. Glucose is freed from the reserves in the liver. [This allows 'quick, short distance' energy supply. Fuel for a sprint.]
8. Cortisone production is increased in order to depress the immune system. [Protection from an instant allergy reaction (such as asthma or closing of the eyes), from a dust up with an attacking foe].
9. Spleen contracts and discharges its content of concentrated corpuscles.
10. Men have an increased supply of the male hormone testosterone

The state of the body in sexual arousal and aggressive arousal are very similar. Alfred Kinsey in his famous report of 1953 says that there are 14 physiological changes that are identical in sexual and aggressive arousal. There are only 4 physiological changes that are different between the two states of emotion. Also it is not uncommon for one response to suddenly switch into the other. This is why an arguing couple can not uncommonly end up in bed. Also in the area of domestic violence, many women report that sexual abuse is viewed by their partners as the finale to a beating

medium_12315_5787 Sex. Perhaps it is not just restricted to these two feelings. That when a person is in a state of emotional arousal they can in fact switch between a number of feelings. As an example of this we humans are a ‘dastardly’ bunch where sexual feelings are so important. (I suppose that makes sense because if the sex drive looses its potency or importance then the species will be skating on thin ice).

Sexual feelings can easily get mixed up with feelings of triumph, superiority and dominance. Then just as quickly some people can switch to the other side and the feelings switch to submission, humiliation and inferiority. Of course what is happening here is because people get sex and power mixed up. Another two important things in human nature. As they sometimes say to couples in couples therapy – “Never argue in the bedroomâ€?. This is because arguments are often about power in relationships and it is good to keep that out of the bedroom.

I suppose it should then follow that one should never have sex on the kitchen table as that may lead to an eating disorder!

medium_shock Shock. Then of course there is love and hate. Yes it is a thin line between the two. The person who hates the ex or continually derides him/her of course is still in love with the ex. If one hates the ex then it does not take much for that to switch to love. Surely the opposite to love and hate is indifference. It is so much harder to be indifferent to the ex than to hate him/her.

Another example of this is the ‘stockholm syndrome’. Those prisoners who get attracted to their captors and develop an attachment with them and want to copy and imitate them. A thin line between love and hate indeed.

medium_a6dcaf1f917ddbe5756 Relief.

medium_brutality-20030603-p Grief and anger.

And then we get to another feeling that of revenge or vengeance. Again these are easy to switch between with an array of emotions. If someone hurts you then you become emotionally aroused with grief, anger, pain, hate or whatever. The feeling then is, “If I can hurt that person back (get revenge) then I will feel better�. Sorry, by and large it does not work that way. The act of revenge often again emotionally stimulates the person and then in one sense they are worse off. They are worse off in the sense of getting over the ‘trauma’ of being mistreated.

medium_knife_in_head Revenge. You hurt me, I hurt you. Don’t get me wrong. To express anger at the person that hurt you is a psychologically healthy thing to do, but then sooner or later you need to “drop the anger� as they say. That is become indifferent to the person who hurt you. Stop being angry at them, stop wanting revenge for the misdeeds done to you. If you don’t then you carry around a big sack of anger and vengeance on your back that slowly and surely grinds you into the ground and destroys you sense of self, current relationships and even physical body. Taking such anger and angst to the grave means you are going to an early grave.

So perhaps the real opposites are the states of emotional arousal and non-arousal. That when emotionally aroused people can easily switch and move between a whole array and variety of emotions. Perhaps these are not opposites but just variants of the same state of arousal.

Graffiti

The empty chair – part 2

August 17th, 2006

The paradox of the empty chair technique

In a previous posting I discussed the empty chair technique. It can be a powerful psychological technique indeed, but as with everything it has its down side. Two such problems come to mind.

The first is the compartmentalisation of the personality. Humans are able to project parts of themselves onto an empty chair. That is they can visualise and feel like there is a part of their personality external to themselves. They can project it into an empty chair. This as mentioned before can have many positive therapeutic advantages as one can firstly become aware of it and then establish a new understanding of it.

But it does have an inherent flaw in it. It does compartmentalise the personality. The happier individual is that person who is integrated. They see and feel like they are a whole, one person. They do not feel like they are a collection of bits or parts of a personality. The empty chair technique highlights the bits as separate from each other.

Indeed there are a collection of emotional disorders that are exactly that. Those people who feel they are just a collection of bits and not an integrated person. These are called the dissociative disorders, with the most prominent one being the Multiple Personality Disorder. The Doctor Jeckl and Mr Hyde. The bits of the personality feel like they are separate and not joined.

Well by its very nature the empty chair technique promotes dissociation as it splits the personality into parts. So one should be careful of using it with those who dissociate as it could just promote the psychopathology.

The other paradox of the empty chair technique is its potential to develop self hatred. Often in the empty chair we place the Critical Parent ego state, or the internal critic as it is known. People with a high internal critic do not like themselves. They spend a good deal of their time criticising self. Telling self how bad they are and this can lead to things like depression. Depressives often have a big internal critic.

medium_phonebox The internal critic

In the empty chair we can ask people to place this part and then get them to reject or get angry at that part. Well this is feeding the pathology. If someone has a self hatred, then to get them to be angry at another part of self is only going to increase the problem. It feeds the pathology.

In a previous posting I highlighted a inherent flaw in the methadone treatment of heroin addiction. By its very nature it says “Take this drug to stop taking drugs�. A double message which contradicts itself.

Well the same applies in this instance of the empty chair technique. If someone has a high internal critic and you get them to put the critic in the empty chair and ask the person to be critical of it then you are giving a double message to the client. You are asking the person to criticise the internal critic for criticising self. A double message to say the least. That can encourage the pathology as much as counter it.

Graffiti

The narcissistic psychotherapist

August 17th, 2006

I have said somewhere before in a blog that psychotherapy can be a surprise because what is sometimes known as the “Helping relationship� maybe helping the psychotherapist more than the client.

Most assume that counsellors and psychotherapists are long suffering humans who listen to their clients recount their lives and the traumas in it. I have often been asked over the years, “How do you cope with listening to people’s problems each day�. Some people start to think of you in a ‘saintly’ way because of this.

However I have stated that I have some narcissistic personality traits. So how can that be when I have been a psychotherapist for over 20 years. If I am constantly focused on the client and not self then that is opposite of a narcissistic personality.

Becoming a psychotherapist
As I have said to trainee counsellors over the years the final stage of development as a psychotherapist, is when you become who you are as the therapist. As people develop as psychotherapists they evolve their own style and and choose their own treatment strategies which they find works best. So in the end you come up with a psychotherapeutic treatment approach that is you. It fits for your personality like a good quality well worn in shoe.

You know what its like when you buy a new shoe. It never fits quite right and is a bit uncomfortable and you may even get a blister or two. As time goes on you and the shoe start to get used to each other and the shoe stretches here and changes there a bit until it fits the mould of your foot, and maybe even your foot modifies a little bit to fit the shoe. Then you and the shoe get on famously.

Well learning psychotherapy is the same. Your original style feels awkward and the techniques you use are a bit uncomfortable at times. One reason is because the approach and the techniques do not fit your personality completely. Over time however that changes and you find a style of counselling that fits for your personality and your personality may even modify a little bit to fit the therapy approach. So in the end the best therapist is one who is just himself. He has evolved a therapy style which fits best for his personality and thus he can be truly himself with the other person (the client). And as we know this is often regarded as the most therapeutic thing of all. Forget the therapy techniques and all, if a psychotherapist can be honest with himself and just be himself in the relationship with the client then that has the most therapeutic benefits for the client. It maybe the first honest relationship that the client has ever been involved in!!.

And my point is?
So if I have some narcissistic qualities (Hey I’m a blogger, I must be narcissistic) what form of therapy did I become interested in and evolve for myself?. Well the treatment style that I naturally was drawn too was the transferential treatment approaches. That group of approaches that uses the relationship between the client and the therapist as the primary tool for change in the client.

As I have said before, in my view transference based treatments are narcissistic in the way they work. Below is a simple diagram that shows how a therapist can focus his attention in the therapeutic setting.

medium_therapist_focus

The therapist can focus his attention out onto the client or he can focus his attention inward onto himself. Of course the inward onto self is the much more narcissistic way. Yes you guessed it! That’s one of the key components of a transference treatment approach. In any transference therapy there are two key components
1) The transferential reactions. These are the feelings, thoughts an attitudes that the client develops towards the therapist.
2) The counter-transferential reactions. These are the feelings, thoughts an attitudes that the therapist develops towards the client.

They are opposite sides of the same coin. In any transference relationship the therapist must have a good and ongoing understanding of his own thoughts, feelings and reactions to the client. This firstly allows for a much better understanding of the client and is crucial if the therapeutic relationship is going to evolve and develop as all relationships must do. To get a good and ongoing understanding of my own thoughts, feelings and reactions to the client I have to focus attention onto myself. There you have it! I am back to thinking about myself again!

By the way don’t tell anyone this. Clients come and pay me to focus on them and think about them when in fact I am thinking about myself!

And there is more
Transference involves an idealisation the therapist. When clients develop a transference with a psychotherapist they will start to view the therapist as an ideal person. They will only see the good qualities in the therapist and exaggerate those. Why? The Child ego state of the person is looking around for the perfect parent that they never had and will see the therapist as that. They unconsciously think, “If I have a perfect parent then they must be parenting me perfectly�.

Depending on the person, the degree of idealisation can vary from a little to a great deal. In the latter you, the therapist, can become the most important person in that client’s life. And that can go on for a long time. What do narcissists do? They over estimate their importance. They feel like they are very important to self, others and the world. So if you have a group of people (your clients) highly valuing your importance to them then that is going to be narcissists heaven.

And there is more
One of the difficulties with using a transference treatment approach is that it is very intense. It is an emotionally draining way to do psychotherapy for both client and therapist. That is OK for the client because he only comes once a week, but for the therapist he may be doing it three times per day. And over time that takes its toll.

Narcissists are sometimes described as having a narcissistic void in their relationships. The myth of narcissus states that because narcissus loved himself so much he didn’t have any love left over for anyone else. So he could never fall in love with another person because he was already in love with himself. So sometimes in relationships narcissistic people can have a gap or space between them self and others. They don’t fully attach or become emotionally ‘involved’ with others like non-narcissistic people can.

So in the therapeutic relationship the narcissistic therapist will have a bit of a gap and thus wont burn out like another therapist using transference treatments might. Every psychotherapist using the transference must be able to do this in some way or they will burn out fast. So the narcissist is a natural at having that little bit of a gap between self and the client.

Relational TA
This is where the theory of Relational TA starts to get a bit fragile. This approach focuses as much of the therapist’s emotional involvement in the therapeutic relationship as the client’s. They denote effective therapy as being somewhat dependent on the,

“Extent to which the therapists allow themselves to be penetrated by client’s affective states and meanings,….â€?

And later they state:

“It has been commonly observed that no psychic change will occur in the client unless the therapist, too, is changed emotionally in some way.� (TAJ (2005). P182, Hargaden & Fenton).

For me one of the most significant contributions this theory has made is its study on the narcissistic or self focus of the therapist in the therapeutic relationship. It examines in detail the ways and meaning of narcissistic examination by the therapist of himself during the therapeutic process. It takes the narcissistic component of the therapist in transference based therapies to new heights.

The problem that I have with Relational TA comes with is the statement that the therapist must emotionally change during the therapy. What does that mean and how much emotional change is necessary?. If one is treating say three clients per day that means they would need to be emotionally changed three times a day every day they worked! Simply not feasible I think you would agree. Such a therapist would burn out in a short space of time.

However I do not discount this treatment style at all as it does present as being a feasible approach indeed. My theoretical understanding of it would add a bit which they they have left out. I would rephrase the previous Hargaden and Fenton statement as such:

“It has been commonly observed that no psychic change will occur in the client unless the therapist, too, is changed emotionally in some way. At the same time the therapist maintains the narcissistic void between self and the client.�

How a therapist can be emotionally touched by a client and still maintain a void between client and self is yet to be elucidated. Indeed a subject that I will be further studying.

Graffiti

The empty chair

July 10th, 2006

The Empty Chair -
no longer is it the couch.

Rob van Tol

http://bobodoll.blogspot.com

Recently wrote a posting titled, “Stuntz Multiple Chair Work and Me�. Multiple chair work is a psychotherapeutic technique. He discusses this technique with a personal statement about his experiences with it. It is used for many therapeutic reasons, one being an awareness or understanding of self. For instance he states,

“So it was import to access my Parent and deconfuse my Adult … Or, in non-TA terms, I didn’t have either a strong conscience, nor look after myself well. And when I think about the here and now I was (and can still be) influenced by the fears and decisions I made as a child.
It terms of awareness, I was just conscious of being, and unaware of the different intrapsychic conversations I had and how they could be categorised, or what their voices sounded like.�

Thanks Rob for being candid.

I will call it the empty chair technique, and you know what? When I began on this career path I was amazed that people could do it and I was even more amazed when I did it!!. So what is “it�. A person sits in a chair and then an empty chair is placed in front of the person about 4 or 5 feet away. They are then asked to imagine some person or some part of themself in that chair and start talking to them/it. Weird, I know. But people can actually do it. I know, I couldn’t believe it either until I saw it with my own eyes.

There is a thing people can do and that is called ‘Projection’. They can kind of put a part of themself out on to some one or some thing in the world. So a person who is angry can project that anger onto others and they will then see others out there as angry when in fact most of them aren’t. This is how the empty chair thingee works. People project some part of themself into an empty chair.

I have never seen such intense emotions of anger and hatred, fear and terror, sadness and grief, despair, love and affection and so on all expressed to a empty chair!! When first asked to do it most feel a bit odd talking to an empty chair, most get over that in about a minute and then project out onto the chair with sometimes such powerful emotions attached.

Lost child ego state

Lost child

People discover all sorts of things such as the lost child part of themself. Because one was abused, scared or maybe just consistently ignored sometimes the emotional part of ourself goes and hides away. A fairly normal thing for kids to do. If mummy is angry then a good, effective solution is to go and hide. Problem solved (in the short term). The problem is if it happens over and over eventually the child gets forgotten about. Our inner emotional self is lost, we forget about it. When that happens people start doing odd things because their basic needs are not met for a significant period of time. For example our need for affection is not met. A woman starts to find that she is being promiscious. Her needs for affection are not being met and she discovers that sex seems to somehow feed that need a bit and so she starts to confuse affection and sex. Empty chair sometimes allows this lost child to be found again.

Promiscuity

Surviving via promiscuity

Sometimes there just seems to be no hope. Whatever you do is wrong. If you say yes it is wrong and if you say no it is wrong. Or mummy is just so preoccupied with her own ‘shit’ she just has no emotions left over for you. (This is not her fault as she proably had a mummy who was the same). You live in an emotional desert and you stave for feeling. Common in habitual drug users.

Man in empty chair

Other times it is the oppostie. Some one discovers in the empty chair that there is a happy, cheerful girl. The good girl. We get lots of mummy and daddy’s attention. They dote on me but there seems to be some conditions on such attention. It is conditional attention. I get lots of attention when I am happy and good and people notice me and say how sweet I am. Mummy and daddy like that. If I am not happy and not ‘performing’ then I either get told off in some way or just ignored. So in adulthood even when I am at my partner’s funeral I find I am smiling.

Good girl

The good girl

Finally the other one is that distance between the idealized self and the real self. We all have an ideal for self in looks, in education, in sport, in popularity, in success, in being a parent and so on endlessly. Then there is the reality that is different from the ideal. For most the difference is not all that large. But sometimes people put the ideal in the empty chair and it becomes obvious that the difference is a fucking chasam, as big as Ayers Rock. These people suffer as they strive to achieve the unachievable. Often they are olympic atheletes. “If I win olympic gold then I will be a worth while person� is the magical belief. Even if they do happen to win it, it still doesn’t fill the void.

Barbie face compare

In search of the ideal self

The best thing that a psychologist can hear is a person say, “I am happy with who I am�. That is music to my ears. We are all fucked up a bit. That is human nature. If one can see the bigger picture and create a life for self where one can live with the good bits and the not so good bits then one has got it together. One is “cured�. If you can love who is in the empty chair, then my job is done.

Name and Shame – Modern day pillory?

July 10th, 2006

Dictionary definition of pillory:
1) A wooden frame to hold the head, hands and/or feet. People were locked in the ‘stocks’ for a period of time as a punishment.
2) If someone is pilloried they are criticised severely, especially in newspapers or on radio and television. “He was pilloried in the newspapers and his resignation demanded�.

Emotions are such an effective way to get people to do what you want. Dare I say it, emotions are a powerful way to control people. Look at these examples that parents can use with children:

Anger – “If you don’t clean your room mummy will get angryâ€?
Guilt – “ If you don’t say you love mummy she will feel sadâ€?
Fear – “ If you don’t behave mummy will go awayâ€? (Fear of abandonment)
Shame – “You should be ashamed of your self for thinking sexual thoughtsâ€?

However shame is in a group of its own in this way. The psychiatrist and prolific writer Charles Rycroft has stated: “Shame is the Cinderella of the unpleasant emotions�.

Of all the emotions shame really hurts, it is painful as all readers undoubtedly would know. Thus people quickly learn that it is an effective tool to get people to do what you think is right. Parents are a good example. Many a parent has said “You should be ashamed of yourself for ……..â€? (Hitting your sister, not eating all your dinner, for masturbating and so on endlessly.)

medium_shame

However that is not the end of the story. If you thought shame was the Cinderella of the unpleasant emotions then you are wrong. It is nothing compared to public shaming. Humiliating someone is bad enough, but publicly humiliating or shaming them is 10 times more powerful. To threaten to publicly shame someone is one of the most potent threats that can be made.

So what’s the problem?. All children have to learn how to behave and what is right and wrong. One could not disagree with that. Shame lets a child no what is right and wrong. That would then seem to be a good learning experience for them. There is just one problem. Shaming a person, especially publicly shaming a person has one unfortunate side effect. It shreds their self esteem. If you publicly humiliate someone then its like putting their self esteem through one of those shredder machines. It cuts to the person’s core sense of self, chews it up and spits it out.

medium_delaware

As any counsellor will tell you, if you are dealing with a person who’s parents used shame as the primary means of socialising a child then you are going to be dealing with a person who’s self image has been butchered. Such a person will not feel very highly of them self at all.

However it is not only parents who can begin to understand the power of publicly humiliating someone. Teachers have for a long time used such a technique. Controlling a class of 25 students is no easy task so public humiliation can be an effective tool. This reminds me of event that occurred many years ago when I was in second year high school. I recall being in the chemistry lab class and there was a fellow student who was joking down the back of the class. In fact I even remember his surname – Bebbington-Smyth – who could forget a name like that!

The chemistry teacher decided to put an end to all this joking and pulled Mr Bebbington-Smyth out to the front of the class. He was going to make him stand in front of the class and squirm – public humiliation in action. A smart move on the teachers behalf as it also showed to all other students that if you misbehave then you get publicly humiliated.

So standing out in front of the class the teacher stated to Mr Bebbington -Smyth that since he was such a comedian why doesn’t he let us all in on the joke. The expectation was that he would stand there in silence feeling humiliated, being pilloried. However Mr Bebbington -Smyth then proceeded to tell his brief funny story to which everyone laughed at the humour of it all!!! The teachers attempt a public shaming had completely backfired!

Here are some images of pillory from the past.

medium_cornwall_1860
medium_williamjarvis

Here is a quote from the editor of the Guardian Express newspaper, (March 28 – April 3, 2006.), which is a local newspaper where I live.

“However, the fact remains that three AFL footballers involved had taken illicit drugs. Had they been caught with these illicit substances by the police, they would have been charged and, in all likelihood, named and shamed� Editorial (Page 6)
AFL football is the major sport where I live and three footballers have tested positive for recreational drugs. The press are in a frenzy because a court has ruled that their names cannot be published. They can’t be named and shamed in public.

The press in the state where I live have a policy of naming and shaming members of the public. What does naming and shaming mean?. It means that they will put your name in the newspaper, often with a photograph, often with the name of the suburb and street in which you live, and then a statement of what you have done that is, in their view shameful or immoral. They have no hesitation in using their naming and shaming policy. They will publicly shame members of the general public with great regularity.

I must say this is a little disconcerting because it makes one wonder who is next? What is the next group of the general public who the press will decide deserve to be named and shamed. Maybe its anyone who has had an affair, or anyone who has had a messy divorce, or anyone who has driven whilst being over the blood alcohol limit and hasn’t been caught, or anyone who has been involved in a domestic dispute. As far as I can tell they can pick anyone or any group they like to publicly humiliate. There seems to be no restriction at all on this policy of naming and shaming by the press.

So here he is the head honcho, Rupert Murdoch. Namer and shamer. Public humiliator. Rupert you should be ashamed of yourself. Just think of all the angst, pain and distress that you have caused for those thousands and thousands of people who you have publicly humiliated.

medium_murdoch-778522

OMG I suddenly realised!!!!. Have I crossed the line, have I gone over to the other side. Have I become!!!, surely not!!!, heavens no!!!, a namer and shamer. I should be ashamed of my self for doing so.

A chemical solution to a chemical problem

July 10th, 2006

In the country in which I live one of the treatment approaches to heroin addiction is the use of methadone. This is called a medical or pharmacological approach to drug dependence. The ‘addict’ is given methadone which is a drug that the person becomes addicted to. The theory is that when addicted to methadone the person is able to live a far more stable life than when addicted to heroin. Also as it can be legally prescribed the person does not have to be involved in the underground world of the drug subculture. They have a way of moving out of that subculture.

There are some/many who dislike this method of treatment for heroin addiction. Firstly the person becomes addicted to the methadone and so they are just switching the addiction and are not stopping the addiction. Reportedly, methadone is quite nasty to withdraw from, much more nasty than heroin. So it does come in for some bad press.

medium_fd62dde4fcb99c495a9

I have met some who strongly dislike methadone and yet I have met others who it has worked quite well for. So again with different treatments it is better to fit the treatment to the person and not the person to the treatment. If it works for the user then do it, if it does not work for the user then do not use it.

There is however another point I would like to raise that questions the pharmacological approach. This is where we get to the title of this article. Methadone is a chemical solution to a chemical problem. It is using a drug to get the person off drugs and thus we have the main problem. The pharmacological approach says: “Do as I say not as I do”. It says: “Take this drug to stop taking drugs”. It is a double message.

Yes one can argue state that there are legal and illegal drugs and that is true, and the user will understand that but still one can say a drug is a drug which is also true. The Child ego state will tend to hear all the words and the rationale, but tend to believe – A drug is a drug.

medium_773af138ca1056d79f1

So it is a similar situation to a parent who is holding a glass of wine in hand whilst telling the teenager not to take drugs. When the teenager makes such a statement to the parent about the hypocrisy of what they are doing and saying , the parent will usually respond that alcohol is OK because it is legal and drugs are not OK because they are illegal. Again the Adult ego state can understand that but the Child ego state tends to see it in more basic (truer?) terms. Alcohol is a drug that gets you out of it and marijuana is a drug that gets you out of it and that means there is not much difference.

Then we have the parent who is puffing away on a cigarette whilst telling the children they should not smoke. “Do as I say, not as I do” is the double message and with humans words are cheap and behaviour counts for much more and will be much more influential in the effects on the child modelling.

So there is an inherent flaw in treating a drug problem with a drug solution. It gives permission to take drugs. However with some addicts it can be a solution. There are some people who are very dependent type people where the only realistic solution is them getting addicted to something that is less harmful. Those who go to Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) are of this kind. The AA approach is that you are an alcoholic and will always be an alcoholic and that you need a higher authority (god) to assist you in staying off alcohol. In other words you are dependent on the higher authority. So the dependency from alcohol moves to the higher authority. However it is a much better life to be addicted to god than to alcohol and some have remained sober for many many years this way.

Perhaps a chemical solution to a chemical problem is one realistic solution for the highly dependent type of drug user.

Psychology and the church

July 10th, 2006

This is an email that i worte to someone recently

Some of my thoughts on the topic of psychology and the church. Many view them as irreconcilable, but in my view that is because they have thrown the baby out with the bathwater.

I will use TA vernacular here but all this applies to psychology in general , in particular humanistic (vs behaviouristic) psychology

It is a fact that for most in our society they do not have enough Free Child ego state, (except for special sub-groups like prisoners who have too much Free Child.) But in general society most neuroses result from too little or damaged Free Child. The Parent ego state via the biological parents damages the Child ego state .

The Parent ego state is a rule book that tells the FC what it can and can’t do, so the natural urges and feelings and so forth get stuffed up because it has to conform to this rule book.

What else is a rule book on how to live life? No, no prize for the right answer. The bible, the Koran or whatever. These ‘books’ very clearly and specifically define how the FC must be (ie the 10 commandments)

So psychologies, or more correctly some people using the psychologies have linked the the bible and the prohibitive parental messages

The Parent ego state and the bible are both a set of prohibitions so some psychologies have made the Parent ego state and the church teachings in the bible the same thing. Indeed many parents, particularly in the past would use the biblical teachings to get the children’s FC to do what they though was best. Often this did screw the youngster up.

The Parent ego state and the bible are both a set of prohibitions so some psychologies or those people using the psychologies have said that religion is bad because it messes up humans psychologically. Indeed this has happened when parents use the teaching of the bible to suppress the Free Child ego state.

However in my view this is a misunderstanding of the church/bible/religion. It misses out one factor and that is that thing called faith/belief/spirituality. Many psychologies would say that when a person has achieved a faith/belief/spirituality then they are more self actualized and more a complete person psychologically.

However many never get to that level of heightened self actualization . Instead they are at the level of just getting their basic shit together. So psychology has tended to see religion as a set of bad script prohibitions that just screw up the Child ego state. But that is a misunderstanding of religion. To have a faith or belief in whatever would be seen as a very psychologically healthy thing. So if one wants to use the bible as the thing in which they have a faith and belief then psychologically that would be seen as a good thing. If one uses the teaching of the bible to prohibit the natural human Free Child then you are going to get neuroses.

Creativity or conforminty

July 10th, 2006

Graffitist or drone?

Why do we/they seek to drive the creative youth out of our society. To turn them into drones who do what they are told, such as those who express themselves with such art forms like graffiti.

There have been many creative artists over the years and most often the social engineers of a society have tried to squash them back to the norm. Fortunately some resist being pushed into the square and we as a society can benefit greatly. Here is one – Sir Mick Jagger. He has been given and accepted a knighthood in the UK. He is now a pillar of society.

But he was a “graffiti artist� in his time. He broke the rules and the social engineers stamped on him hard.

In 1967 he was arrested and charged with possession of amphetamines and heroin. He was found guilty and imprisoned. He certainly broke the rules just like the graffiti artist.

medium_mick_mug_shot.png Sir Mick Jagger, Knight of the British Empire.

(Wait a minute! The social engineers tell us that if you take amphetamines you go crazy. Well Mick Jagger and his co-accused Keith Richards didn’t go crazy. Maybe the social engineers are treating us like we are dumb arses. Not telling us the whole truth about such things as drugs and expecting us to just accept it like sheep.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

But he also broke other rules. He “drew pictures on the wallsâ€? by writing such songs as – (I can’t get no) Satisfaction:

I can’t get no satisfaction,
I can’t get no girl with action.
’cause I try and I try and I try and I try.
I can’t get no, I can’t get no.
When I’m ridin’ round the world
And I’m doin’ this and I’m signing that
And I’m tryin’ to make some girl
Who tells me baby better come back later next week
’cause you see I’m on losing streak.
I can’t get no, oh no no no.
Hey hey hey, that’s what I say.
I can’t get no, I can’t get no,
I can’t get no satisfaction,
No satisfaction, no satisfaction, no satisfaction

medium_destroylit.jpg Sir Mick in action. I think that says “Destroy” on his T-shirt. That’s a nice sociable thing to project to the impressionable fans.

How did the social engineers react -

The song’s lyrics were extremely controversial in their day; Jagger stated that “the lyrics to this were truly threatening to an older audience. This song was perceived as an attack on the status quo”. The part where Jagger addressed his romantic troubles was also perceived to be overtly sexual suggestive; when the Rolling Stones performed the song on The Ed Sullivan Show in 1966, the line “trying to make some girl” was censored.

And now

Well he has been knighted and the social engineers are now crowing about how their society developed this person and he is the front man of one of the most famous rock & roll bands of all time. Even though they were the ones that tried to extinguish him in the first place!!

(However it should be noted that in true graffitist style, his fellow band member Keith Richards stated of Sir Mick’s knighthood – “I thought it was ludicrous to take one of those gongs from the establishment…it’s not what the Stones is about, is it? I don’t want to step out on stage with someone wearing a fucking coronet and sporting the old ermine. I told Mick, ‘It’s a fucking paltry honour.’)

Graffitists
It seems possible, perhaps even probable that some graffitist now will develop into a very fine artist at a later time. But the social engineers will try their hardest to stop him being creative now and make him into a drone. Then in 10 years when he is receiving accolades for his fine artistry the social engineers will again be there standing next to him taking the kudos for having a society that can produce such fine artisans.

Two examples
In the final analysis one needs to make a choice at least to some degree between creativity and conformity or between graffitist or drone. A good friend of mine (Yoshita Moronaga) an organisational psychologist in Japan writes:

“The structure of Japanese society in itself places a lot of pressure on the individual. It is a sad fact that Japanese society tends to stifle creativity. We even have an expression for this – ‘The nail that stands up will be hammered down’. As one example, Japan has won only four Nobel prizes in science while American researchers have won 158.â€? (As of 1990)

Singapore is in the same situation to some degree. In that society there is very little graffiti and they openly acknowledge that their society lacks creativity.

Eating disorders

July 10th, 2006

Eating disorders

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

I need to eat in order to stay alive. I can’t get food myself. I am dependent on this person to give me the food so I can live. Food – dependency – life. Now that is a problematic equation.

.

.
.
.

You have to be perfect. I am dependent on this person. They want my body to be perfect. If I am not perfect they will not give me food. If I have no food I will die.

.
.

.
.

.
.
.
.

I am dependent on this person. I don’t know who I am. This person defines who I am. This person wants me to be alive. If I don’t eat I wont be alive. I can be who I am by not eating. I can be who I am by starving to death.

Cutters

July 10th, 2006

Recently I came across a blog that was a collection of stories by “Cutters�. Those people who self harm or self mutilate. That is they deface themselves physically in some form either by cutting self, burning self, biting self, pinching self, picking at ones self and so forth.

Bloggers comments
As I have said before blogs seem to allow people to be more candid in what they say about themselves and this can provide invaluable information. To get information from cutters, who are often people in their teens or young adulthood is a difficult thing to do. In face to face discussions I have always found them to be much more reluctant than I have found with those who talk about self harming in blogs. Below are a few examples:
————————–
I’m 27 yrs. old and have been cutting for a few years. It’s been burning before that. At the time, I completely thought that the cutting was rational and logical. It equalled to or amounted to more than what I was feeling at the time. But now I look at my left arm (for some odd reason it’s the only place I’ve hurt myself), and I sometimes feel pangs of regret for it all. I carved in the words pain and numb, and the worst cutting incident happened a few months ago.
Me and my fiancé hit a really rocky patch. It was horrible. My heart was breaking at that moment and I needed something, anything, to dull it, numb it. I grabbed my stash of razors and headed for the parking lot behind our apartment we used to live in.
————————

I was just curious as to everyone’s preference of object used while cutting/injuring themselves….
i’ve used a knife, a compass (the math kind), safety pins, fingernails, teeth, a razor blade, and probably some other stuff I can’t think of right now
i only used an actual razor once and i don’t understand how people can use razors. maybe i just prefer the dull pain of sawing at a cut until it’s deep enough to seep blood in place of the quick sharp pain of a razor that shows a cut seconds later, though they are good for writing words.
———————
This is a personal monologue I performed for my basic acting course a couple of weeks ago. It kind of messed me up for a while but I think I’m back to resisting my addiction. In my mind cutting is an addiction. I just wanted to share this with all of you.
I’ve been wanting to tell you and talk to you for ages, before you find out. Some of my friends know and they gave me some moral support and helped me tell some other people. And I really want to stop and I’ve been working hard on it, I mean, the first step is always realising you have a problem and wanting to fix it, right?
I can’t even say it. I’m sorry. It’s-It’s easier to just show you. I cut. I cut my self, I’m a cutter.
———————
i feel like i want to die. why is it when my friends are sad or upset i feel compelled to cut myself to take over their pain. it kills me every time deep inside! i just wish that the world would end. there is just so much that troubles me i hate everything any more i know i should be happy but i feel like shit. i did cut myself tonight one word on my flesh….death.
—————
hi i am a new member i am 17 and have been cutting for four years now and every night all i seem to think about is cutting but i seem to be able to resist it… most of the time
——————-
I’m 17 and i’m a cutter. I don’t think i’m writing this just so everyone can know that “I’m” a cutter but just cause i don’t want to feel alone in this anymore. I have only got caught once and i’ve been doing this for like 4 years. I used to cut my wrist until my friend found out and she told… so then now I cut my stomach. Its much easier to hide it if you do it there. Its kind of weird to explain any of this.. Its hard to believe that i’m not the only one that feels this way. I hold everything in and i hide everything behind this invisible mask. and then i cut myself to relieve the pain that i hold inside.
——————–

Hi i’m Nick and i’m 15. I haven’t cut in…i stopped counting the days because it depresses me. But over 167 days. The first time i was three and it lasted until i was 8 and then i started at 12 and that lasted until i was 14. It was really bad when i was 14 and i got caught and now i can’t cut. AND IT HURTS SO MUCH. sometimes at night i just go into the bathroom and clutch the razors and cry. I want it so badly.
————
Hi, my name is **********, and I am 16. I have been cutting since I was about 12. I am from Biloxi, Mississippi. I love the scars that are left. I also love to burn myself with a lighter. Right now I have about 30 cut scars, and 2 burn scars. I have been trying to quit, but somehow I seem to go back to it. I have been institutionalised (i think thats how you spell it) twice for cutting. I have attempted suicide 3 times. 2 by overdose, and one by almost hitting a major artery in my wrist. The reason I cut is because my mother never shows me any affection, she has never told me she loves me, or kissed me or shown any love towards me at all.

Cutting and suicidal ideation
There is a common belief that if one cuts or self mutilates then they are suicidal. This is not so. There can be three groups in this way. First there are those who do self mutilate but have no suicidal ideas or urges. They are at little risk of suicide but are at risk of potentially permanently and significantly damaging them self with the self mutilation gone wrong. Second there are those who can have strong and persistent suicidal urges who have no desire to self mutilate. Thirdly there are those who are both suicidal and self mutilate.

Obviously if one is working with a person who self mutilates (or expresses suicidal urges) then it is advisable to firstly begin to understand which group the individual belongs to. Sometimes the lines between them are very clear and sometimes they are much less clear. Often parents can be convinced their son or daughter is suicidal because they have cut self, an obvious conclusion to come to for a distraught parent, but sometimes it is simply not the case

Bodily mutilation as normal?
Now I will set about normalising ‘cutting’. Humans have been physically mutilating themselves and others since time began. Circumcision is a perfect example. That is a clear example of genital mutilation. I remember along time ago in my studies of anthropology learning that some of the Australian Aborigines practised subincision (As a male so I would remember this!). An cut is made along the urethra on the underside of the penis. In some cases the cut goes from the head of the penis right to the scrotum. Now that is what you call bodily mutilation!

Alas guys it does not end there. Customary unilateral castration (monorchy) is known in central Algeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, southern Africa, and some Australian Aborigines. Bilateral castration was common to produce eunuchs for Muslim harem attendants and for several centuries to produce male sopranos or contraltos called castrati for ecclesiastical chants in the Roman Catholic church.

Females fair no better in some countries and over history I’m afraid. FGM as it is politely referred to these days or female genital mutilation.
Female modifications include excision (of part or all of the clitoris — clitoridectomy, female circumcision — and sometimes also of the labia, mons, or both), in much of Africa, ancient Egypt, India, Malaysia, and Australia;
Incision (of the external genitalia, without removal of any part) among the Totonac (Mexico) and tropical South American Indians;
Infibulation (induced adhesion of the labia minora, leaving only a small orifice, to prevent sexual intercourse until the orifice is reopened by incision) in the Horn of Africa and among some Arabs;
Dilatation (of the vaginal orifice, often with incision) among some Australian Aborigines;
Elongation of the labia (tablier), recorded for southern Africa and the Caroline Islands;
Artificial defloration (among Australian Aborigines and elsewhere).

In psychological terms genital mutilation would generally be considered more indicative of problems than cutting of say the arms or the legs. So here we have many examples of cultures having mutilated the genitals of their constituents for many years. So in this sense there is nothing odd about the actual act of mutilating the human body. In this sense it is normal. In addition to these are many other examples of tattooing and scarification, removal of teeth, teeth sharpening, neck lengthening, binding the hands and feet to make them smaller, not to forget all the cosmetic surgery that is now almost endemic in the country where I live. Most of these bodily mutilations which are usually completely voluntary and have been around in many cultures since humans first evolved. Most people when confronted with a person who cuts will be perplexed with the ‘abnormality’ of the act. My point here is that mutilating the human body, by others or by yourself is not an abnormal act at all.

Why?
However when one begins to look at why the bodily mutilation occurred then we do find a difference. A woman who goes and gets her breasts enlarged does it so she believes she looks more sexually attractive in her community. Or a man may cut long scars in his chest so he can later expose the scar tissue to others knowing that it is a sign of increased status in his community. Another man may cut long incisions in his stomach because he feels so numb and distressed its the only way he can begin to feel something. Two very different scenarios. So what are some of the reasons why a person would be a cutter.

1. The tattooing type of cut. Some teenagers can cut (or whatever else) self because it is what the gang (peer group) do. The scar becomes the symbol of belonging to the group and it is their secret ritual that separates them from others, particularly the parents. This is similar to members of a motorcycle club who get a tattoo which signifies them as a member. This type of self mutilation usually does not indicate significant emotional distress in the teenager. The mutilation is often minor and often transitory because it hurts too much.

A derivative of this seems to be the case where the the individual cuts a word into self and thus gets the resultant word scarified into the skin. One of the examples above mentioned a man who cut the word “death� into his skin. Or the example of the 16 year old girl who kept count of her cut scars and burn scars. The scarification symbolises something to the person and the goal is to find out what it is a symbol of and then you know what you are working with.

2. Some report that cutting “makes me feel real�. The technical term for this is derealization. The individual feels there is a sort of gap between them and reality. They feel detached from it. The act of cutting or burning with the resultant pain and then seeing the blood flow allows that ‘gap’ to disappear for a period of time and thus one gains a sense of normality or reality. This most often happens because the Child ego state is excluded. Once the individual begins to access that part of themselves again the derealization reduces and the need for self mutilation should reduce.

3. Similar to number 2 is the person who says that the cutting, “makes me feel something�. In this case there is not a sense of not being connected with reality but with just having very little feeling at all. The person reports feeling numb or just nothing. In some of my work with street kids (homeless) I have seen them on a bitterly cold day just wearing a light t-shirt. They simply do not feel the cold. In such cases it is quite likely that the Child ego state is also very shut off and accessing it again would seem to be the course of action to take. Of course in 2 and 3 the Child ego state has become shut off for some reason and when one begins to reopen it up again those reasons are going to become obvious. Usually it is because the person has suffered some form of trauma, often repeated trauma in their life and the feelings about that will resurface when the Child ego state is reopened. In numbers 2 and 3 one can begin to understand how the cutting could become addictive an some ‘cutters’ report it is. It is the one form of temporary relief that they have.

4. Cutting for tension relief. If the Child ego state is shut down then that works fine in the short term. It stops the painful feelings and makes them ‘go away’. However they do not go away they just sit there in the person and in the long term they start to get ‘louder’. When this happens a symptom of some kind will develop. Some get depressed, some have panic attacks, some get phobias, some hit the bottle or others can begin to cut self. An unexpressed feeling will simply grow in volume the longer it remains unexpressed. In this sense a tension can be seen to grow in a person and cutting maybe one way in which to release some of that tension. And it works, but only in the short term, unfortunately it comes back if it is not expressed in a satisfying form which cutting cannot provide. If it did then the tension would not come back.

5. Finally there is the shock value of the self mutilation. As I mentioned before most people will be shocked when they find out and see the scars of a person who has self mutilated. It is dramatic and it is attention grabbing in most cases. Does the cutter create scars that are in a visible position on the body or do they only do it where it is quite unlikely someone will see it. If the person is doing such scarring so it gets attention then one needs to find out why such a attention seeking is necessary for that individual.

In the city where I live if a person goes into a health center of some sort and shows the scars to the ‘health professional’ then by law that professional must take some action such as recommending hospitalization. If they do not do this then they could face possible de-registration or possible litigation for not providing an adequate duty of care. So if someone wants to go to hospital or be put into the health care system then all they have to do is show the results of their self mutilation to the appropriate person. Such a thing gets a great deal of attention.

This is not meant to be a complete list of reasons why cutter, cut. In fact I am sure it is incomplete but it is a start and i will add to it when appropriate.